e.g. The Sound Evidential Basis of Abolitionist Journalism

I am providing this as an example of the relationship between the facts placed before the abolitionist press in good faith and the things they say about us.

In Response to (statement made publicly):

Look at this:


 …and it is a BIG civil rights issue, but when Stormont publish my name, address phone numbers and a facsimile of my signature and refuse to take it down since April, and “Turn Off the Red Light” host clear incitement to hatred against me on their facebook page since July it is just “Gaye making a fuss about nothing” and (excepting those who knew nothing about it of course) NOT ONE PERSON raises a word of protest on my behalf…

 …anybody still confused as to why I need to be a recluse?

 I get the message, paedophiles matter I do not, end of.

From: Philip Bradfield [mailto:Philip.bradfield@newsletter.co.uk]

Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 12:08 PM

To: Gaye D

are your details still online anywhere Gaye?


From: Philip Bradfield [mailto:Philip.bradfield@newsletter.co.uk]

Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 12:37 PM

To: Gaye D

I was under the impression it had been removed long ago?

Thirteen days?

From: Philip Bradfield [mailto:Philip.bradfield@newsletter.co.uk]

Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 3:07 PM

To: Gaye D

if your beef is with the justice committee write to the assembly ombudsman.


From: Philip Bradfield [mailto:Philip.bradfield@newsletter.co.uk]

Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:47 AM

To: Gaye D

– did you ask for your details to be kept private?

Have you politely spoken with the Justice Committee clerical team to ask how it happened?

Their contact details are here – http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/assembly-business/committees/justice/

I think they are quite helpful and open.

Let me know how you get on.

Had I indeed?

 From: Gaye D [mailto:mechanima@gmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:16 PM

To: ‘Philip Bradfield’

Subject: FW


From: Gaye D [mailto:mechanima@gmail.com]

Sent: 21 May 2014 22:57

To: ‘+Comm Justice Public Email’

Subject: Breach of Privacy in Trafficking Bill Report


Dear xxxxxx,

Please pass this to the Justice Committee, it certainly is not directed at you:

Why in the name of all did the committee see fit to publish not only my name, but my full address and both telephone numbers at the end of the report on sex work?

I am a 56 year old woman living alone in a remote location. I am officially disabled, autistic , with compound PTSD (that predates sex work by a very long time. I was a pupil at Duncroft among other things). I am so reclusive I cannot cope with a trip to the Doctor and do not know my neighbours after living here since 1990. I am too mentally and emotionally fragile to survive a move. I also have limited mobility due to a combination of a compound fracture last year and spinal arthritis. Most of this is well known and was also made clear in the late submission I sent in to the committee that they somehow did not bother to post as well.

Here it is where I live:

[Link Redacted]

Apparently my just punishment for swearing out the truth about a criminal fraud is to have my location and contact details posted online and by HMSO for the whole world to know and do whatever harm they please with, even though I specifically asked that my privacy be respected.

I genuinely believe this decision was an act of vindictive spite on the part of DUP members of the committee because my only submission is to the truth not to their corrupt and evil nonsens

I hope they are very proud of themselves, because I somehow doubt that their God is.


Gaye Dalton

…of course emails sometimes get lost or overlooked…

…but not that one…

From: Philip Bradfield [mailto:Philip.bradfield@newsletter.co.uk]

Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 8:34 AM

To: Gaye D


I made a submission too and it was published in full – it needed the backing of the full committee. If you didnt ask for your name to be omitted why expect that it would be?


…correcting misunderstanding….

From: Gaye D [mailto:mechanima@gmail.com]

Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 2:15 PM

To: ‘Philip Bradfield’


It was not my name…It was my name, private rural address and all telephone numbers…as well as the private details of the commissioner for oaths

…and that didn’t go astray either…

From: Philip Bradfield [mailto:Philip.bradfield@newsletter.co.uk]

Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:09 PM

To: Gaye D

I am sure the clerks would be sympathetic to your concerns – have you contacted them?

…is it any wonder the same mind produces such informational gems as:








Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s